This bail application was allowed. The High Court granted bail to the applicant, relying on the fact that he had already been granted bail in other cases linked to the same FIR, with conditions regarding attendance and non-interference.
The applicant was released on bail furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:34863
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4845 of 2024
Applicant :- Akram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sukh Deo Singh,Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 6.5.2024 VNP/-
Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail having been granted bail in cases shown against him.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Akram
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko.
Pankaj Bhatia
Vishvanath Prasad Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
