Bitto vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Govt. U.P. Lko.

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:31867

Court No. - 12

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4474 of 2024

Applicant :- Bitto Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Govt. U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.0207 of 2023, under Section 306 IPC, P.S. Behta Mujawar, District Unnao.

¶8

3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co-accused on the same allegation was enlarged on bail vide order dated 11.03.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2138 of 2024.

¶9

4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶10

5. Considering the allegation against the applicant to be similar and adopting the reasoning as contained in the order dated 11.03.2024, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶11

6. Let the applicant Bitto be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶13

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

Order Date :- 24.4.2024 nishant

¶15

Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Bitto v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Govt. U.P. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bitto v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Govt. U.P. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pyare Lal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Dinesh Kumar Gupta @ D.K. Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Suraj Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Anil Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Mohd. Ashraf Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Dheerendra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow and Others