Allowed

Dinesh Kumar Gupta @ D.K. v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Allahabad HC23 Apr 2024/2964/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the applicant in a criminal case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities Act. The court allowed the application based on the principle that bail was already granted in the sole case relevant to the gang chart.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is released on bail by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each and complying with standard conditions.

Dinesh Kumar Gupta @ D.K. Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:31578

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2964 of 2024 Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Gupta @ D.K. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Mrs.Suniti Sachan,Gangeshwar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶5

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶6

2. This is the second bail application of the present applicant. The first bail application was rejected as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh on 27.02.2024.

¶7

3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.333 of 2023, under Section 2(b)(i) and 3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Paliya, District Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶8

4. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the sole case referred to in the Gang Chart, the applicant has been granted bail.

¶9

5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶10

6. Considering the fact that the applicant is on bail in the sole case referred to in the gang chart, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶11

7. Let the applicant Dinesh Kumar Gupta @ D.K. be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶13

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

Order Date :- 23.4.2024 nishant

¶15

Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Dinesh Kumar Gupta @ D.K. v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Kumar Gupta @ D.K. v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rahul Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Mohit Trivedi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Badal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow and Others

Pyare Lal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko

Suraj Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Rafiq Ahmad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl.Chief Secy. / Prin. Secy. Home Lko.