Bail application adjourned due to paucity of time; listed for a future date. No decision taken.
Adjournment order only. The bail application was not heard for want of time and was directed to be listed on 04.12.2024. Nothing of general application is decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 31
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4413 of 2024
Applicant :- Kanhaiya Kaushal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Civil Sectt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Prashansa Singh,Mohit Sharma,Mukul Kumar Sharma,Pramod Kumar Tiwari,Smt. Usha Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
Due to paucity of time, the matter could not be taken up.
List on 04.12.2024.
Order Date :- 12.11.2024 R.C.
Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Kanhaiya Kaushal
State Of U.P.
Karunesh Singh Pawar
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
