Bail granted to applicant accused of sexual assault and cheating under IPC and POCSO Act. The court considered the victim's statement failing to identify the applicant and the co-accused being already on bail.
Bail granted on personal bond and two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each, subject to standard conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:57617
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4268 of 2024
Applicant :- Shahanshah Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Milan Yadav, Chetan Kumar Tiwari, Faraz Ahmad,Mohammad Shahzad Ahmad, Om Prakash Yadav, Shamshad Ahmad
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 23.8.2024 VNP/-
Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail given the victim's statement and lack of specific implication?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shahanshah
State Of U.P Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Others
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
