Allowed

Tribhuvan Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC9 Apr 2024BAIL/3988/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the bail application of the applicant in a robbery and armoury case, granting bail on the ground of parity as a co-accused had already been released on bail. The applicant was ordered to execute personal bonds and provide sureties subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed on furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each, subject to standard conditions.

Tribhuvan Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:44697

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3988 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Tribhuvan Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ramakar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Surendra Pratap Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR/Case Crime No.03 of 2024, under Sections 392, 411, 506 IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, Police Station Musafirkhana, District Amethi.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the co accused Krishna Kumar has been granted bail vide order dated 21.5.2024 passed by this Court. Thus, the applicant who is languishing in jail since 12.1.2024 having no criminal history, may also be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not deny the ground of parity.

¶10

Considering and adopting the same reasonings as has been recorded in the bail order of the co accused coupled with the fact that the allegations against the applicant are similar to the co accused who has been granted bail by this Court and the applicant having no criminal history and languishing in jail since 12.1.2024, is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity.

¶11

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant Tribhuvan Kumar be released on bail in the above said first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the

¶13

following conditions:

¶14

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶15

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶16

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

Order Date :- 1.7.2024

¶18

Shukla

¶19

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Tribhuvan Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tribhuvan Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Deep Narain Nishad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Amit Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. of U.P. Lucknow and Others

Mohd. Mohsin Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko. and Others

Raj Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Abhijeet Kumar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.

Ajay Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko and 3 Others