In a bail application under Sections 395 and 397 IPC, the single judge rejected the plea for release, citing the applicant's extensive criminal antecedents involving loot and dacoity, despite the delay in charge framing.
Bail application rejected; trial court directed to conclude trial expeditiously within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:38949
Court No. - 8
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3954 of 2024
Applicant :- Vinod Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shubham Chaurasiya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
circumstances, as it is evident that applicant is having long criminal history related to the offences under Sections 395 and 397 I.P.C., therefore, I am of the view that the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail.
Order Date :- 21.5.2024 V. Sinha
Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to an applicant accused of dacoity having a history of criminal antecedents.
Whether the delay in framing charges entitles the applicant to bail.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Vinod
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
