Allowed

Mohit Trivedi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC18 Apr 2024BAIL/3937/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allowed bail application for accused in cases of 498A/306 IPC. Held applicant entitled to bail due to lack of specific abetment allegation and explained prior criminal history, releasing him on personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with a personal bond and two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each, subject to attendance, non-committal of similar offences, and no tampering with evidence.

Mohit Trivedi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:31192

¶2

Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3937 of 2024 Applicant :- Mohit Trivedi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Nagendra Singh,Prashant Singh,Raghvendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶4

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶5

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.0640 of 2017, under Section 498A, 306 IPC, P.S. Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow.

¶6

3. It is argued that the co-accused, husband of the victim, was enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 10.08.2018 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.892 of 2018.

¶7

4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶8

5. Considering the aforesaid fact coupled with the fact that there is no specific allegation against the applicant of abetment as defined under Section 107 IPC, as such, the applicant who has criminal history of one case which is duly explained, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶9

6. Let the applicant Mohit Trivedi be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶10

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶11

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶12

Order Date :- 22.4.2024 nishant

¶13

Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mohit Trivedi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohit Trivedi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vijay Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, U.P. Lko.

Avneesh Kumar Nishad @ Aneesh Nishad Vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Mustakeen Vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. of U.P. Lucknow

Ram Sagar vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko.

Mohd. Ashraf vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Santoshi vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P.