Haarun v. Union of India (D.R.I)
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in a bail application before the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench; the applicant's counsel was absent and the case was listed for a later date. No merits were decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3379 of 2024
Applicant :- Haarun Opposite Party :- Union Of India (D.R.I) Counsel for Applicant :- Parmanand Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- Digvijay Nath Dubey
Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant is not present. However, Shri Digvijay Nath Dubey, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
- List this case after ten days.
Order Date :- 4.9.2024 DiVYa
Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Haarun
- respondent
Union Of India (D.R.I)
Coram
Brij Raj Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/3379/2024
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court