Allowed

Rajesh Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko.

Allahabad HC13 Mar 2024BAIL/2831/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail in a criminal proceeding under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant, father-in-law of the deceased, had similar allegations matched to his detained mother-in-law who was already released on bail.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each.

Rajesh Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home… — Domestic Violence | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:22127

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2831 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Rajesh Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2 . The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.504 of 2023, under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Tandiyawan, District Hardoi.

¶8

3 . It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the father-in-law of the deceased. The mother-in-law has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 27.02.2024 on similar allegations.

¶9

4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

¶10

5. Considering the allegations to be similar against the applicant coupled with the fact that the applicant is the father-in-law and has no criminal antecedents and is in custody since 28.01.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant Rajesh Mishra be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

¶15

inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 13.3.2024 akverma

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Rajesh Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Nitesh Tiwari Vs the State of U.P. Thru.Secy. Home Deptt.

Mohd. Arsh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home

Mahesh Pasi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Sectt. Lko

Amit Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. and Another

Sachin Shrivastava Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Home, Deptt., Lucknow

Rajesh Mishra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko.