Allowed

Mahesh Pasi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Sectt. Lko

Allahabad HC12 Mar 2024/1137/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the criminal miscellaneous bail application filed by Mahesh Pasi. Relying on the fact that the applicant is already on bail for alleged gang offences and is in custody since 2022, the court directed his release on bail in the specific FIR under the U.P. Gangsters Act conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No.01 of 2023 on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of the like amount each subject to conditions.

Mahesh Pasi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:21736

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1137 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Mahesh Pasi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Sectt. Lko Counsel for Applicant :- Suyesh Pradhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the basis for invoking the provisions of Gangsters Act against the applicant is the only one case which has been shown in the gang chart and in the said shown in the gang chart, the applicant is on bail. The applicant is also on bail in the other cases. The applicant is in custody since 26.8.2022, hence the applicant may be released on bail.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the sole case shown in the gang chart and in other cases, the applicant is also on bail, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail.

¶10

Accordingly, the present application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Mahesh Pasi be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No.01 of 2023, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dehat, District Sitapur on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: -

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police ofÏcer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 12.3.2024

¶16

Shukla

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mahesh Pasi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Sectt. Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Pasi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Sectt. Lko

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ayyub Khan Alias Sikandar Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Sunil Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Smt. Ramjanki Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Nitesh Tiwari Vs the State of U.P. Thru.Secy. Home Deptt.

Mohd. Arsh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Home

Ram Krapal Vs State of U.P through Principal Secretary Home Department Civil Secratriat, Lucknow and 3 Others