Second bail application in an FIR alleging cheating and forgery offences involving alleged collection of about Rs.70 crore from the public. Trial court reported that discharge applications and adjournments by accused delayed framing of charge. Court found no ground for bail and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:58730
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2673 of 2024
Applicant :- Sarvesh Kumar Agrahari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Yadav,Naved Ali,Pawan Bhaskar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
victim.
From the said report, it is evident that only by filing discharge application, adjournments are being taken by the applicant, due to which, charge could not be framed till date.
Order Date :- 28.8.2024 VKS
Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a second bail application should be granted when trial delay is caused by accused's own discharge application and repeated adjournments.
7 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarvesh Kumar Agrahari
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
