In a bail application arising fromIPC offences of child snatching and kidnapping, the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, rejected the applicant's prayer. The court held that the applicant was the prime architect of the crime.
Bail prayer rejected; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:34335
Court No. - 8
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2626 of 2024
Applicant :- Geeta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Counsel for Applicant :- Prem Lata Devi,Suresh Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Order Date :- 2.5.2024 Arpan
Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant, alleged as the prime architect of child snatching resulting in IPC offences including Section 363, is entitled to bail.
Geeta
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
