The High Court allowed the second bail application of Raju accused in CPC (302 IPC). Relying on prolonged detention since 2016 and near-completion of prosecution evidence, the court held the applicant entitled to bail.
Released on bail: personal bond and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:27742
Court No. - 12
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2607 of 2024
Applicant :- Raju Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Suyesh Pradhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 4.4.2024
VNP/-
Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in view of prolonged pretrial detention and near-completion of prosecution evidence.
Raju
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
VNP/-
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
