Allowed

Shahjad @ Haudi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Allahabad HC6 Nov 2024BAIL/11585/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal bail application under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities Act, 1986, the Court allowed the applicant's prayer for enlargement on bail based on a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each and specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail in FIR No.112 of 2024 on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each.

Shahjad @ Haudi vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:73122

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11585 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Shahjad @ Haudi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kr. Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.112 of 2024, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Mahrajganj Tarai, District Balrampur.

¶8

3 . Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart. The copies of the bail orders are on record.

¶9

4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant Shahjad @ Haudi be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 6.11.2024 akverma

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Shahjad @ Haudi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahjad @ Haudi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Zahir Ahmad Vs IV Th Additional District Judge Faizabad

A K Multimedia Thru. Proprietor Mohd. Akram Khan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Commissioner, State Good and Service Tax, Lko. and 2 Others

Satya Prakash Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Usha Chaudhary Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko.

Mohd. Kaif Vs State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko.

Preeti Singh Vs Tarun Singh