Ram Newatia v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home)
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line order noting the listing of the bail application with a pending co-bail application and directing the opposite party to file a counter affidavit within three weeks.
What the court decided
Court No. - 11
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11414 of 2024
Applicant :- Ram Newatia Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Counsel for Applicant :- Saurabh Singh,Ripu Daman Shahi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajeev Kumar Mishra Rudra
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
Heard Shri R.D. Shahi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Rajeev Kumar Mishra Rudra, advocate, who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of complainant, which is taken on record.
Let objection/ counter affidavit be filed within three weeks.
Connect and list this case along with Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.11413 of 2024 (Shiva Kanaujia Vs. State of U.P.).
When the case is next listed, the name of Shri Rajeev Kumar Mishra Rudra, advocate be printed in the cause list as counsel for the opposite parties.
(Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.)
Order Date :- 25.10.2024 (Manoj K.)
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ram Newatia
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/11414/2024
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Saroj Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Lko and 5 Others
Brijesh Kumar Awasthi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko.
Brijesh Kumar Awasthi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. Home
Rohit Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another