Allowed

Brijesh Kumar Awasthi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Allahabad HC24 Oct 2024/3009/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail application for applicant in FIR under IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471. Granted bond with two sureties of Rs. 30,000 each on conditions regarding attendance, non-commitment of similar offenses, and witness protection.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with personal bond, two sureties of Rs. 30,000 each, and specific conditions regarding conduct and office visits.

Brijesh Kumar Awasthi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:71896

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3009 of 2024 Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Awasthi

¶4

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Pratap Singh,Prateek Tewari,Shailendra Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; Shri V.K. Shahi, learned AAG assisted by Shri Anurag Verma, learned counsel for the State; Shri Dadu Ram Shukla, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.

¶7

2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.190 of 2023, under Section 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda.

¶8

3. It is stated by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar set of facts, the applicant has been granted bail today itself in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3470 of 2024, as such, the applicant may be granted bail in the present case also.

¶9

4. Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in a similar case, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail in the present case also. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶10

5. Let the applicant Brijesh Kumar Awasthi be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶11

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶12

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶13

(d) The applicant shall not visit any office of the District Courts, any office of the Sub-Registrar or any office of the Tehsildar.

¶14

6. The victims and the witnesses would be entitled to protection if they move an appropriate application before the trial Court.

¶15

Order Date :- 24.10.2024 nishant

¶16

Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Brijesh Kumar Awasthi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brijesh Kumar Awasthi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Yamini Bansal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Mangra @ Taufeeq Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secy. Lko.

Ajayjeet @ Sanju Shukla Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko.

Saroj Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Lko and 5 Others

Brijesh Kumar Awasthi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Addl. Chief Secy. Home

M/S Aastha Construction Thru. Prop. Seema Singh Hargaon Pargana Vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. Commercial Tax Deptt. Lko. and 2 Others