Allowed

Jagdish and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Allahabad HC23 Sept 2024BAIL/10135/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities Act, 1986, the Allahabad High Court allowed the release of the applicants on personal bonds with sureties, noting their existing bail status in the sole case depicted in the gang chart.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicants Jagdish and Rohit on bail with personal bonds and two sureties of Rs. 20,000 each.

Jagdish and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:65871

¶2

Court No. - 12

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10135 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Jagdish And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Kumar Awasthi,Amit Bhatt,Vineet Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2. The present bail application has been filed by the applicants seeking bail in FIR No. 661 of 2023, under Section 2(b)(i)/ 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and AntiSocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Dhaurahra, District Lakhimpur Kheri.

¶8

3. Submission of Counsel for the applicants is that the applicants are on bail in the sole case shown in the gang chart. The copy of the bail order is on record.

¶9

4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶10

5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the cases shown in the gang chart, I am of view that the applicants are entitled for bail. Thus, the present application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicants Jagdish and Rohit be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report number on their furnishing personal bonds with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 23.9.2024 akverma

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Jagdish and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Santosh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Imarn @ Chand Babu Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko.

Mohd. Aleem Khan Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Babu Ram Pal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Sectt. Lko

Deshraj vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and others

Ramkali vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko