A defective appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 by the National Highways Authority of India against Sallar @ Rajesh Kumar and others. Counsel filed power for respondent no.1; the matter was listed after two weeks without any decision on the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- APPEAL UNDER SECTION 37 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 DEFECTIVE No. - 32 of 2024
Appellant :- National Highways Authority Of India Thru Project Director Piu Lucknow Respondent :- Sallar @ Rajesh Kumar And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- Vijay Kumar Tewari,C.S.C.,Harish Chandra Tripathi
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Sri Harish Chandra Tripathi,Advocate submits that he has filed power on behalf of the respondent no.1 as Sri Vijay Kumar Tewari, learned counsel for the respondent has diled.
List after two weeks.
Order Date :- 11.12.2024 Akanksha Sri.
Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
National Highways Authority Of India Thru Project Director Piu Lucknow
Sallar @ Rajesh Kumar And Ors.
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
