The court adjourned the hearing of the application for two weeks to allow the applicant to file objections, if any.
This is a routine procedural order adjourning the matter for two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- CIVIL MISC. ARBITRATION APPLICATION No. - 45 of 2024
Applicant :- M/S A.K. Bajpai, Through Shri Arvind Kumar Bajpai Opposite Party :- Union Of India, Through General Manager, Northern Railway, New Delhi And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pritish Kumar,Shikhar Mishra
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
As per office report the service of notice on the respondent nos.1 and 2 is deemed sufficient.
Shri Shesh Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Shri Pritish Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant prays for adjournment on account of some personal difficulty.
The case is adjourned for the day.
As prayed, list after two weeks.
In the meantime, objection, if any, may be filed.
...................................................................(Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 15.7.2024 Haseen U.
Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
M/S A.K. Bajpai, Through Shri Arvind Kumar Bajpai
Union Of India, Through General Manager, Northern Railway, New Delhi And Another
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
