Mahtab Ahmad v. State of Up
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. adjourned for the day at counsel's request and directed to be listed fresh on 8.11.2024; no substantive decision taken.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9800 of 2024
Applicant :- Mahtab Ahmad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Yatharth Srivastava,G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
At the request of counsel for the applicant the case is adjourned for the day.
Place this case as fresh on 8.11.2024.
Order Date :- 23.10.2024 S.S.
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mahtab Ahmad
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/9800/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Vivek Varma
- Order 2 · Vivek Varma
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court