Anticipatory bail application in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case was not granted; the court directed that if applicants appear and move bail before the trial court, it shall decide the application expeditiously per Supreme Court guidance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:170912
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9488 of 2024
Applicant :- Shakeel Ahmad And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Rai,Gaurav Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.
This anticipatory bail application (under section 438 Cr.P.C.) has been moved seeking bail in Case Crime No. 0071 of 2022, under Sections 420, 506, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Ramraj, District Muzaffar Nagar till the conclusion of trial.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that they are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. No offence is made out from the allegation made against them. It is also submitted that since the offences said to have been committed are punishable with sentence less than 7 years, therefore, a direction be given to the learned trial court to make disposal of the bail application in light of the Satender Antil's case.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer as aforesaid.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. and perusal of record, it is directed that, if applicants appear and move bail application before the learned court concerned the same shall be decided by it as expeditiously as possible in the light of latest law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another LL 2022 SC 577 decided on 11.07.2022.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the above direction.
Order Date :- 24.10.2024 Suraj Srivastav
Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be disposed of with a direction to decide any bail application expeditiously in light of Satender Kumar Antil.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another LL 2022 SC 577 decided on 11.07.2022
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shakeel Ahmad And Others
State of U.P.
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
