Subedar Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The Hon'ble Single Bench directed the applicant's counsel to file updated copies of order sheets from the concerned Court as they were missing, after admitting the anticipatory bail application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 82
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8987 of 2024
Applicant :- Subedar Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Shekhar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
- Case called out.
- Learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA are present.
- Copy of charge sheet has been filed alongwith supplementary affidavit, however, copies of order sheets submitted by the applicant are not update.
- Hence, learned counsel for the applicant is directed to file copies of the latest order sheets of the case pending before the Court concerned.
- Put up as fresh on 9.12.2024 before the appropriate Bench.
Order Date :- 12.11.2024 safi
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Subedar Yadav
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/8987/2024
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court