The Высокая Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn. The applicant was directed to surrender within one month and was granted an injunction against coercive action for that period or until surrender.
Direction to surrender within one month; no coercive action during that period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:147296
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8686 of 2024
Applicant :- X Juvenile Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kr. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.
Order Date :- 10.9.2024 Sumit S
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to file a regular bail application.
Whether coercive action should be restrained for a specific period.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherExplained¶9
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in _(2022) 10 SCC 51_ · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
X Juvenile
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Krishan Pahal
Parties & counsel
