The Single Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail application, directing the applicant to surrender within one month. The applicant is advised to file a regular bail application to be decided in accordance with the Supreme Court guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil.
Direction to surrender within one month; no coercive action for this period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:146920
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7046 of 2024
Applicant :- Sheetala Prasad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashwini Kumar,Pramod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 10.9.2024
Shalini
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be dismissed with a direction to file a regular bail application.
Whether coercive action shall be taken against the applicant during the one-month surrender period.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶8
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, 2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sheetala Prasad
State of U.P.
Another
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
