The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant despite the presence of counsel who had previously appeared. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:193412
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8193 of 2024
Applicant :- Anil Shukla Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vikas Yadav,Vishveshwar Mani Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Order Date :- 10.12.2024 Sanjeet
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Shukla
State of U.P.
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
