Rishabh @ Rishabh Panwar v. State of Up
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application withdrawn by the applicant. Court allowed withdrawal with liberty to file regular bail application before competent court.
What did the court decide?
Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file regular bail application before competent court.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:143255
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8004 of 2024
Applicant :- Rishabh @ Rishabh Panwar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Haya Rizvi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
- Heard Mr. Ahmad Farhan, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Haya Rizvi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State. Perused the record.
- The present application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 168 of 2024, under Sections 308, 427, 352 I.P.C., Police Station Khatauli, District- Muzaffarnagar.
- At the outset, counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of the present bail application with liberty to the applicant to file regular bail application before the Court of competent jurisdiction.
- Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to such request.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rishabh @ Rishabh Panwar
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/8004/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court