Sneha @ Pinki v. State of Up
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application listed but adjourned as counsel for the applicant was absent. Trial court directed to report on trial status; matter to be heard among top ten cases.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 626 of 2024
Applicant :- Sneha @ Pinki Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Keshari Nath Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Case called out. Learned counsel for the applicant is not present.
Let a report be called from the trial Judge regarding status of the trial within two weeks.
Place this case on 25.09.2024 amongst top ten cases of the list.
A copy of this order be sent to the trial Judge through the District Judge, Moradabad by the Registrar (Compliance) of this Court within 24 hours.
Order Date :- 3.9.2024 SKT/-
Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sneha @ Pinki
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/626/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court