Raju and Another v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court adjourned the anticipatory bail application due to the learned AGA stating he had not received instructions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7814 of 2024
Applicant :- Raju And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Learned AGA submits that he has not received the instructions in the present case.
Place this case as fresh on 14.08.2024.
Order Date :- 8.8.2024 Lbm/-
Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Raju And Another
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/7814/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court