Anticipatory bail granted to applicants in a dispute regarding commercial relationship. Applicants conditioned to not interfere with witnesses, leave India or violate court process.
Anticipatory bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7326 of 2024
Applicant :- Rajkumar Agarwal @ Thos And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rajiv Sisodia,G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
(i) the applicants shall make himself available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned;
(ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court;
(iii) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport the same shall be deposited by them before the concerned court.
Order Date :- 12.8.2024 SK Srivastava
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicants are entitled to anticipatory bail in the pending criminal case.
Whether the condition relied on the Informant was not adversarial.
Rajkumar Agarwal @ Thos
State of U.P.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
