Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC; after the State distinguished the applicant from co-accused already enlarged on bail, counsel for the applicant did not press the application, which was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:121836
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6925 of 2024
Applicant :- Smt Nootan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Jai Raj Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Learned AGA points out various distinguishing features of the case of the applicant from the other co-accused persons who have been enlarged on bail.
Faced with this Shri Jai Ram, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not wish to press the anticipatory bail application.
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.7.2024 Dhananjai
Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Nootan
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
