Anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed. Court held no case made out for bail as applicant was named in FIR with specific role and cartridges recovered from his possession.
The prayer for release on anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:130168
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6809 of 2024
Applicant :- Krishna Chandra @ Krishna Chandra Agrahari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajneesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mayank Kumar Jain,J.
Order Date :- 12.8.2024 RKK/-
Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail given his specific role in the offence and recovery of cartridges.
Whether the case can be distinguished from similar cases where co-accused have been granted bail.
Whether the alleged additions or omissions of charges affect the grant of anticipatory bail.
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Krishna Chandra @ Krishna Chandra Agrahari
Mayank Kumar Jain
Raj Kumar Kanauji
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
