Applicant sought anticipatory bail in a cyber-crime FIR involving forgery and cheating offences; counsel withdrew the application seeking regular bail instead. Court directed surrender within one month and interim protection from coercive action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:120569
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6798 of 2024
Applicant :- Farmod @ Farmud Ansari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Indu Shekhar Mishra,Uma Dutt Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 29.7.2024
Shalini
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the applicant be granted anticipatory bail for FIR under Sections 420/467/468/471/419/120-B IPC and 66D IT Act?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherRelied on
2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Farmod @ Farmud Ansari
State of U.P.
Another
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
