Anticipatory bail application in a cheating and forgery case was not decided on merits; following Supreme Court directions that applications arising out of the same crime number be handled consistently, the court directed that the matter be placed before the Chief Justice for assignment to the appropriate Bench as a fresh listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6745 of 2024
Applicant :- Kuldip Saraswat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Order Date :- 11.7.2024 Bhaskar
Digitally signed by :- BHASKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application arising from the same crime number as a co-accused's disposed application should be heard by the same Bench to avoid contrary orders.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pradhani Jani Vs. State of OdishaRelied on
Criminal Appeal No.1503 of 2023
Sajid Vs. State of U.P.Relied on
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.7203 of 2023
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Kuldip Saraswat
State of U.P.
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
