Dismissed
Banwari v. State of Up
Allahabad HCABAIL/6586/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant with liberty to surrender and apply for regular bail.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to surrender and apply for regular bail.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:115783
¶2
Court No. - 72
¶3
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6586 of 2024
¶4
Applicant :- Banwari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶5
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
¶6
- Sri Balram Singh, Advocate, has entered appearance and filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the informant. The same is taken on record.
¶7
- Heard Sri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State, and Sri Balram Singh, learned counsel for the informant, and perused the record.
¶8
- The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 181 of 2024, under Section 304 I.P.C., Police Station Tanda, District Rampur.
¶9
- After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of this application with liberty to the applicant to surrender and apply for regular bail.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Banwari
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/6586/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Vivek Varma
- Order 2 — this page · Vivek Varma
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court