Imtiyaj v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.; counsel sought time to file a supplementary affidavit and the matter was adjourned to be listed afresh on 05.08.2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6563 of 2024
Applicant :- Imtiyaj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bindu Kumari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant seeks time to file supplementary affidavit.
List this case on 05.08.2024 as fresh.
Order Date :- 8.7.2024 K.K. Maurya
Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Imtiyaj
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vikram D. Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/6563/2024
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court