On their own motion, this Court noted that bail applications from different co-accused in the same crime were being heard by different benches. Relying on Supreme Court directions, the matter is remitted to the Chief Justice for assignment to an appropriate bench to ensure uniformity.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6266 of 2024
Applicant :- Amit Kumar Gautam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sumit Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
Order Date :- 3.7.2024 Bhaskar
Digitally signed by :- BHASKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
How to prevent contradictory bail orders on different benches for sameCrime?
What measures must the High Court take under Supreme Court directions regarding co-accused bail?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pradhani Jani Vs. State of OdishaReferred¶6
Criminal Appeal No.1503 of 2023, Pradhani Jani Vs. State of Odisha
Sajid Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶6
Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.7203 of 2023, Sajid Vs. State of U.P.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amit Kumar Gautam
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
