Disposed

Mohd Sarif v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC2 Jul 2024ABAIL/5968/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., directing the applicant to file a regular bail application, surrender within four weeks, and prohibiting coercive action during that period.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application disposed of; direction to file regular bail application and surrender within four weeks; no coercive action for that period.

Mohd Sarif vs State of Up and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:114629

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5968 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Mohd Sarif Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Mohan Pandey,Ashish Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vineet Vikram

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Ashish Pandey, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Jai Kishan Chaurasia, learned A.G.A. for State. None is present on behalf of the opposite party.

¶7

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.34 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Jawan, District Aligarh.

¶8

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 .

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within four weeks from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶11

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶12

Order Date :- 18.7.2024/Sumit S

¶13

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohd Sarif v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Sarif v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohd. Shaheem @ Kasim vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow

Mohd. Shaheem @ Kasim vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lucknow

Kuldeep Singh Chauhan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Deptt. of Home

Narendra Singh Chadel vs State of U.P. and Another

Puneet Kumar Srivastava vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohammad Riyaz Siddiki vs State of U.P. and Another