Dismissed

Sujeet Yadav v. State of Up and 2 Others

Allahabad HC9 Jul 2024ABAIL/5896/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by Sujeet Yadav as withdrawn. The court granted liberty to the applicant to file a bail application before the court below, directing the lower court to decide the same expeditiously while adhering to the principles laid down in Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to apply for bail before the court below.

Sujeet Yadav vs State of Up and 2 Others — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:110942

¶2

Court No. - 73

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5896 of 2024 Applicant :- Sujeet Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Pratibha Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

¶6

The present Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant- Sujeet Yadav in Case Crime No.0134 of 2022, under Sections 147, 420, 406, 452, 352, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C., Police Station - Zafrabad, District - Jaunpur.

¶7

After some argument, learned counsel for the applicant states that she may be permitted to withdraw this application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. with liberty to file bail application before the court below.

¶8

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

Under the circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicant to approach the court concerned for bail. In order to enable the applicant to approach the court concerned for bail, for a period of 15 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. In case, the bail application is preferred by the applicant before the court concerned, the court concerned shall decide the same expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournment to any party. While considering the bail application of the applicant, the court below shall keep in mind the principles of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773.

¶10

The anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty and direction.

¶11

Order Date :- 9.7.2024 D. Tamang

¶12

Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sujeet Yadav v. State of Up and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujeet Yadav v. State of Up and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akhilesh @ Akhilesh Kumar and 2 Others vs State of Up and Another

Smt. Mamta Behra Alias Shabnam vs State of U.P. and Another

Shamim vs State of Up Others

Salma vs State of U.P.

Anand Singh and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Aslam vs State of U.P. and Another