Jitendra Kumar v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The court rejected the anticipatory bail application as infructuous after the informant's counsel stated a closure report had been filed by the Investigating Officer.
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:128891
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4453 of 2024
Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shiv Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
- List has been revised.
- None has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the present anticipatory bail application. However, Sri S.P. Pandey, learned A.G.A. is present for the State.
- The instant anticipatory bail application was filed on 29.04.2024 and the case was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the applicant on 02.05.2024. None was appeared to press the anticipatory bail application on 04.07.2024 and so is the case today in the revised call.
- Ms. Ruchi Devi, holding brief of Sri Shiv Kumar Singh, has put in appearance on behalf of the informant and has stated at bar that already the instant anticipatory bail application has rendered infructuous as the closure report has been filed by the Investigating Officer.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application rendered infructuous due to closure report?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jitendra Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/4453/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Krishan Pahal
- Order 2 · Krishan Pahal
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court