Smt Mamta v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C.; the court adjourned it to 2 January 2025 at counsel's request without any substantive decision.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4001 of 2024
Applicant :- Smt Mamta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Goel,Deepak Pandey,Rajeev Sawhney Counsel for Opposite Party :- Alpika Srivastava,G.A.,Neeraj Srivastava
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
- List has been revised.
- Learned counsels for both the parties are present.
- As prayed by the learned counsel for the applicant, put up this case on 2nd January, 2025 in the additional cause list.
Order Date :- 6.12.2024 Sumit S
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Smt Mamta
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/4001/2024
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court