The applicant's counsel stated the anticipatory bail application had become infructuous and did not wish to press it. The opposing party raised no objection. The application was dismissed as not pressed.
Application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:144387
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3173 of 2024
Applicant :- Adil Rana Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Naushad,Rajiv Sisodia Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajneesh Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 5.9.2024 Sumit S
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the anticipatory bail application be dismissed as not pressed?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Adil Rana
State of U.P.
Another
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
