Dismissed
Suresh v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCABAIL/3095/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant was absent to press the same.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 64
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3095 of 2024
¶3
Applicant :- Suresh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Atul Kumar,G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
¶5
- List revised.
¶6
- No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application. Sri Atul Kumar, learned counsel for the first informant is also not present. Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State is present.
¶7
- This matter is nominated to this Bench vide order dated 22.04.2024 of Hon'ble The Chief Justice.
¶8
- This anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant- Suresh, seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 44 of 2023, under Sections 498-A, 323, 377, 376, 506, 307 I.P.C. & Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Budhana Mahila Police Pramarsh Kendra, District Muzaffar Nagar, during pendency of trial.
¶9
- Since there is no representation from the side of the applicant, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Suresh
- respondent
State of U.P. and Another
Coram
AI extract
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/3095/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Samit Gopal
- Order 2 · Samit Gopal
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court