Dismissed
Vinod Kumar v. State of Up
Allahabad HCABAIL/1350/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The applicant's counsel submitted that the anticipatory bail application had become infructuous. The Court dismissed the application on this ground.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:128694
¶2
Court No. - 72
¶3
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1350 of 2024
¶4
Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jeetendra Kumar Sharma,Laxmi Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ram Babu Singh
¶5
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
¶6
- The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No. 993 of 2023, under Sections 304, 504, 506 I.P.C. & Section 15(2) of Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Police Station Kannauj, District Kannauj.
¶7
- At the outset, Sri Jeetendra Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant application has been rendered infructuous.
¶8
- Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
¶9
Order Date :- 8.8.2024 SK Srivastava
¶10
Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Vinod Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/1350/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court