Anil Kumar Maurya v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order does not decide the matter. The application is listed after 10 days to enable the Standing Counsel to obtain instructions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11723 of 2024
Applicant :- Anil Kumar Maurya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Tripathi,Pankaj Sahni Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
- Learned AGA states that he has not received instructions in this matter.
- List after 10 days as fresh.
- In the meantime, learned AGA shall obtain instructions.
Order Date :- 6.12.2024 SKD
Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Anil Kumar Maurya
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Deepak Verma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/11723/2024
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court