Dismissed

Pawan Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC14 Nov 2024ABAIL/11091/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The applicant surrendered the petition, and the court ordered his surrender within four weeks while allowing a future regular bail application to be decided under Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed; applicant to surrender within four weeks; liberty to file regular bail application later.

Pawan Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:196839

¶2

Court No. - 65

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11091 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Pawan Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 647 of 2016, under Sections 354(D), 504, 506 of I.P.C., P.S.- Hapur Nagar, District- Hapur.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C.. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the direction that the applicant shall surrender before the court concerned within four weeks from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the court concerned, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

Order Date:- 16.12.2024 Siddhant

¶14

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pawan Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Rinkoo Rana Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Sumit Jaisawal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Vichitra Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Brajpal Giri and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Bhura @ Farman vs State of U.P. and Another

Alka Alias Alkesh Devi vs State of Up