Court allowed anticipatory bail to the applicant, who was not named in the FIR but later implicated as a guarantor, relying on Sushila Aggarwal and noting no criminal history.
Anticipatory bail granted till conclusion of trial on personal bond with sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:196922
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11050 of 2024
Applicant :- Mahesh Gupta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
case, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed, he will not misuse the liberty and shall cooperate with trial.
i. that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court;
iv. that the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial;
v. that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness;
vi. that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;
Order Date:- 16.12.2024 Siddhant
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail in view of his antecedents and the nature of allegations?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi)Relied on¶14
Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020) 5 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
6 provisions across 2 enactments
Mahesh Gupta
State of U.P.
Another
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
