The High Court refused anticipatory bail on merits but directed expeditious disposal of the applicant's regular bail application upon surrender within two weeks, following Supreme Court guidelines.
Expedient disposal of regular bail application directed upon surrender within two weeks; no coercive action during this period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:168009
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10269 of 2024
Applicant :- Om Prakash Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Shukla,Sarvesh Kant Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Order Date :- 22.10.2024
Nitin Verma
Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for anticipatory bail on merits should be allowed when not pressed on merit.
Whether a direction for expeditious disposal of the pending regular bail application after surrender is appropriate.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationExplained¶11
2021 SCC OnLine SC 922 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Om Prakash Sharma
State of U.P.
Deepak Verma
Nitin Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
