Anticipatory bail sought in a case involving alleged axe injury; all offences punishable with maximum seven years and applicant cooperated during investigation without arrest. Court granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial with standard conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:175029
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10107 of 2024
Applicant :- Munish Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
i. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
ii. that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court;
iii. that the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial;
iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness;
v. that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;
Order Date :- 7.11.2024 AK Pandey
Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail in an FIR for offences punishable with up to seven years after charge-sheet without arrest.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Munish Kumar
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
