Archana Tiwari vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Others

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:65834

Court No. - 11

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 650 of 2024

Applicant :- Archana Tiwari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State.

¶7

2. Instant application under Section 483 Cr.P.C (Now Section 529 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) has been filed praying for a direction to the learned court below to expeditiously decide the proceedings pending before it.

¶8

3. On the other hand learned AGA on the basis of Constitution Bench judgment in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad Vs. State of U.P and Ors- 2024 (256) AIC 66 (SC) argues that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the constitutional Courts should not normally fix a time-bound schedule for disposal of cases pending in any Court. It has further been held in the said judgment that the issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the concerned Courts where the cases are pending.

¶9

4. Considering the aforesaid Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad (supra) the instant application is disposed of permitting the applicant to move an application before the concerned Court pointing out the grounds of urgency. In the event the applicant does so, the concerned Court may consider whether the case should be expedited having regard to the urgency of the case.

¶10

Order Date :- 23.9.2024 A. Katiyar

¶11

Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Archana Tiwari v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Archana Tiwari v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Agrawal and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Vs Smt. Neetu

Raj Kumar and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Mohd. Parvez Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Shiv Sharan Mishra vs U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Its Managing Director Lko and 2 Others

Aishwarya Batham vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Lko and 3 Others